Costa Rica Developing at an Unsustainable Rate?
Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009
So says the recent report entitled, Estado de la Nación (State of the Nation). The bottom line according to the report is that Costa Ricans are consuming more resources than the country can provide and generate more waste than it can absorb. All this seems to fly in the face of Costa Rica’s avowed harmony between development and care for the environment. The report goes to show that to maintain a proper equilibrium between these two often competing forces is a very delicate balancing act. The report evaluates Costa Rica’s impact along two measurements, “bio-capacity” and “ecological footprint.” Bio-capacity has to do with the capacity of an ecosystem to produce biologically useful material and absorb waste generated by humans. Investigators found that Costa Rica’s bio-capacity per person is 1.66 hectares. That is, to produce a sufficient amount of material and absorb the resulting waste from consumption each person in Costa Rica needs 1.66 hectares of space. This measurement takes into account the current actual lifestyle of a typical Costa Rican, in terms of rate of consumption and generation of waste. As for “ecological footprint” the report found that each tico has a footprint of 1.86 global hectares. When you subtract Costa Rica’s ecological footprint from its bio-capacity a deficit is produced. This basically shows, according to the researchers, that Costa Rica would need 12% additional territory to meet the needs of development. In short, the development is unsustainable and thus dependent on the bio-capacity of other countries. Costa Rica thus is viewed as an eco-debtor. Even so, Costa Rica is nevertheless well below the average ecological footprint of other countries of the world, which stands at 2.7 global hectares per inhabitant. The report cites as the cause for the deficit both patterns of consumption along with population growth. Also contributing to Costa Rica’s poor showing are high emission of contaminating gases, the consumption of its forests, and inefficient use of its resources.

I wrote in my other blog, 















